Bottom Pressure Sensor |
There are both good and bad things with people using bottom pressure sensors. First, they can be expensive. Secondly, putting them under the water in the ocean can cause harm to the natural environment around them. Consecutively, this could cause a chain reaction that could start out with either the lack of habitat or damaged habitat for a few species, and then spiral out to effect huge monsters such as the great white shark through the food chain. If one species of animal decreases, the ones that eat it decreases, and then the ones that eats them die too. Although using bottom pressure sensors could potentially cause big problems for many of the animals in their areas, they could also make possible homes for small fish, shrimp, and plants. Algae could begin to grow on the bottom of the buoy and around the edges of the sensor, providing food for little fish, shrimp, crab, and other small, underwater creatures. This could lead to a rise in these animal populations (which are mostly prey) and that, in turn, could lead to a rise in the secondary and tertiary consumers. That whole ocean area would flourish for a while until the food begins to run out, when all species would start to decline in population numbers.
According to scientists, you can also use GPS satellites to predict tsunamis. Satellites can tell how much the earth in the ocean has actually been moved, and then geologists can use this information to determine whether or not there is a tsunami risk or not. The GPS strategy works by scientists measuring the time signals from the satellites take to arrive at earthquake stations within a couple thousand kilometer radius of the quake itself. That way, they can tell how much the stations have been moved by the earthquake, and then decide if there could be a potential tsunami.
The problem with the GPS satellites is that they can’t actually sense or measure a tsunami. They can only tell whether or not there might be one. However, because they can make scientists aware of the fact that a potential earthquake might occur, they are more alert and better prepared if there really is one. Also, combined with the information from the bottom pressure sensors, the accuracy of the satellites might add an extra couple of minutes to evacuation, which could save many lives.
Another way people try to predict tsunamis is to trace an underwater earthquake to its epicenter. Once you figure out where the epicenter of an earthquake is, you can determine where the tectonic plates pushed up to create a wave. Then, you can decide whether or not your area is in tsunami range, and save your city. The problem with this is that most underwater earthquakes do not create big waves. Then, people evacuate the city for no reason. It’s a big waste of time, money, and resources, and it doesn’t even work that well anyway.
How Tsunamis are Formed |
Resources:
1.) "Tsunami-recording in the Deep Sea." PhysOrg.com - Science News, Technology, Physics, Nanotechnology, Space Science, Earth Science, Medicine. Web. 22 Feb. 2011. <http://www.physorg.com/news114696029.html>.
2.) "Savage Earth: Predicting Tsunamis." PBS: Public Broadcasting Service. Web. 22 Feb. 2011. <http://www.pbs.org/wnet/savageearth/tsunami/html/sidebar1.html>.
3.) "Predicting Tsunamis — GEOL 105 Natural Hazards." A Class Blog on Current Hazard-related Events — GEOL 105 Natural Hazards. Web. 22 Feb. 2011. <http://geol105naturalhazards.voices.wooster.edu/predicting-tsunamis/>.
4.) "NGI News Story -- Sep 18, 2010: FSU Researcher Deploys Bottom Sensors." Northern Gulf Institute. Web. 22 Feb. 2011. <http://www.northerngulfinstitute.org/news/fullstory.php?nid=351>.
5.) "GPS Can Predict Tsunamis." Universe Today. Web. 22 Feb. 2011. <http://www.universetoday.com/199/gps-can-predict-tsunamis/>.
Nice work
ReplyDelete